Cerebrovascular disease in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The association between COVID-19 and acute cerebrovascular disease (CVD) has not been explored extensively. New data has come to light which may change previous results. Methods: We queried the PubMed electronic database from its inception until February 2022 for studies evaluating the incidence of stroke in COVID-19 patients. Results of the analysis were pooled using a random-effects model and presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: 37 studies consisting of 294,249 patients were included in our analysis. Pooled results show that the incidence of acute CVD events in COVID-19 positive patients is 2.6% (95% CI: 2.0-3.3; P<0.001). Cardioembolic (OR=14.15, 95% CI: 11.01 to 18.19, P<0.00001) and cryptogenic (OR=2.87, 95% CI: 1.91 to 4.32, P<0.00001) etiologies were associated with COVID-19 positivity. Risk factors for CVD events in patients with COVID-19 were atrial fibrillation (OR=2.60, 95% CI: 1.15 to 5.87, P=0.02), coronary artery disease (OR=2.24, 95% CI: 1.38 to 3.61, P=0.0010), diabetes (OR=2.46, 95% CI: 1.36 to 4.44, P=0.003) and hypertension (OR=3.65, 95% CI: 1.69 to 7.90, P=0.005). Conclusion: COVID-19 infection is associated with an increased risk for acute CVD and is associated with cardioembolic and cryptogenic etiologies and the risk factors of atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, diabetes and hypertension in COVID-19 positive patients.

A National Perspective on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the United States.

Nationwide data of the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on heart failure (HF) hospitalizations is lacking. We conducted this study to elucidate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HF hospitalizations. Additionally, we assessed the differences in hospitalization characteristics during the pandemic and the impact that a concurrent diagnosis of COVID-19 has on various outcomes and predictors of inpatient mortality among patients admitted for HF. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for all hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of HF between 2017 and 2020. Monthly HF hospitalizations were trended longitudinally over this period. Beginning April 1, 2020, concurrent COVID-19 infections were identified. Subsequently, we stratified HF hospitalizations between April 2020 and December 2020 (HF-2020) based on if concomitant COVID-19 was diagnosed, forming the HF-COVID+ve and HF-COVID-ve groups respectively. HF-2020 was also compared with prepandemic HF hospitalizations between April 2019 and December 2019 (HF-2019). Baseline characteristics were compared, and adjusted outcomes were obtained. During the initial COVID-19 surge in April 2020, HF admissions were reduced by 47% compared to January 2020. Following this decline, HF hospitalizations increased but did not reach prepandemic levels. HF-2020 admissions had an increased complication burden compared to HF-2019, including acute myocardial infarction (8.9% vs 6.6%, P < 0.005) and pulmonary embolism (4.1% vs 3.4%, P < 0.005) indicating a sicker cohort of patients. HF-COVID+ve hospitalizations had 2.9 times higher odds of inpatient mortality compared to HF-COVID-ve and an increased adjusted length of stay by 2.16 days (P < 0.005). A pandemic of the same magnitude as COVID-19 can overwhelm even the most advanced health systems. Early resource mobilization and preparedness is essential to provide care to a sick cohort of patients like acute HF, who are directly and indirectly effected by the consequences of the pandemic which has worsened hospitalization outcomes.

Cardiovascular outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction among COVID-19 patients: a propensity matched national study.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction Type II (T2MI) is a prevalent cause of troponin elevation secondary to a variety of conditions causing stress/demand mismatch. The impact of T2MI on outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is not well studied. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from the year 2020 was queried to identify COVID-19 patients with T2MI during the index hospitalization. Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes 'U07.1' and 'I21.A1' were used as disease identifiers for COVID-19 and T2MI respectively. Multivariate adjusted Odds ratio (aOR) and propensity score matching (PSM) was done to compare outcomes among COVID patients with and without T2MI. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,678,995 COVID-19-weighted hospitalizations were identified in the year 2020, of which 41,755 (2.48%) patients had T2MI compared to 1,637,165 (97.5%) without T2MI. Patients with T2MI had higher adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.44, PSM 32.27%, 95% CI 1.34-1.54) sudden cardiac arrest (aOR 1.29, PSM 6.6%, 95% CI 1.17-1.43) and CS (aOR 2.16, PSM 2.73%, 95% CI 1.85-2.53) compared to patients without T2MI. The rate of coronary angiography (CA) in T2MI with COVID was 1.19%, with significant use of CA among patients with T2MI complicated by CS compared to those without CS (4% vs 1.1%, p < 0.001). Additionally, COVID-19 patients with T2MI had an increased prevalence of sepsis compared to COVID-19 without T2MI (48% vs 24.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients with T2MI had worse cardiovascular outcomes with significantly higher in-hospital mortality, SCA, and CS compared to those without T2MI. Long-term mortality and morbidity among COVID-19 patients who had T2MI will need to be clarified in future studies. [Figure: see text].

Effect of COVID-19 on cardiac electrophysiology practice: a systematic review of literature.

The authors conducted a systematic review on the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 on electrophysiology (EP) practice and procedure volume in various settings. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase were examined with combinations of medical subject headings terms for identification of the relevant studies. After excluding duplicates, irrelevant, and ineligible studies, 23 studies were included for full qualitative analysis. The overall study-level volume reduction of EP procedures ranged from 8 to 96.7%. All studies reported an overall reduction in EP physiology procedures being carried out except one in Poland, which reported an overall increase in the total EP procedures carried out in 2020. This study still reported a decrease in EP procedure volume during the first lockdown phase. Procedural volume reduction was seen most commonly for cardiovascular implantable electronic device placement (20/23 studies, 86.9%), electrophysiology studies (11/23 studies, 47.8%), and ablations (9/23, 39.1% studies). The most common reason stated for the observed decline in EP procedures was the cancellation and postponement of nonurgent elective cases in the hospitals (15/23 studies, 65.2%). There has been an overall reduction in EP procedure volume across different centers. The impact of the decline in EP procedures will be seen only after the services resume to prepandemic levels, but an increase in-patient volume and procedure waiting time is expected. This review will provide insights into improving healthcare service delivery in times of unprecedented public health emergencies.

Antiandrogens for the treatment of COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Antiandrogens may carry a potential benefit as a therapeutic agent against COVID-19. However, studies have been yielding mixed results, thus hindering any objective recommendations. This necessitates a quantitative synthesis of data to quantify the benefits of antiandrogens. We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, clinical trial registers, and reference lists of included studies to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results from the trials were pooled using a random-effects model and outcomes were reported as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Fourteen RCTs with a total sample size of 2593 patients were included. Antiandrogens yielded a significant mortality benefit (RR 0.37; 95% CI; 0.25-0.55). However, on subgroup analysis, only proxalutamide/enzalutamide and sabizabulin were found to significantly reduce mortality (RR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.16-0.30 and RR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26-0.68, respectively), while aldosterone receptor antagonists and antigonadotropins did not show any benefit. No significant between-group difference was found in the early or late initiation of therapy. Antiandrogens also reduced hospitalizations and the duration of hospital stay, and improved recovery rates. Proxalutamide and sabizabulin may be effective against COVID-19, however, further large-scale trials are needed to confirm these findings.

In-Hospital Outcomes of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Propensity Matched National Cohort.

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy (TTS) is an acute reversible left ventricular dysfunction with regional ballooning secondary to various physical or psychological triggers, including COVID-19. The impact of TTS on outcomes in COVID-19 patients is not well studied. The Nationwide in-patient sample database from 2019 to 2020 was utilized to identify TTS patients with and without COVID-19. Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes U07.1 and I51.81 were used as disease identifiers for COVID-19 and TTS, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to report adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and propensity score match (PSM) was done to compare outcomes among TTS patients with and without COVID. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A total of 83,215 TTS patients for the period 2019-2020 were included in our study, of which 1665 (2%) had COVID-19. COVID-19 with TTS group had higher adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 7.23, PSM 32.7% vs 10.16%, p = <0.001), cardiogenic shock; (aOR 2.32, PSM 16.7% vs 9.5%, P < 0.001) and acute kidney injury; (aOR 2.30, PSM 47.5% vs 33.1%, P< 0.001) compared to TTS without COVID-19. TTS hospitalizations with COVID-19 were associated with longer lengths of stay (12 ± 12 vs 7 ± 9 days) and higher total cost ($47,702 ± $67,940 vs $26,957 ± $44,286) compared to TTS without COVID. TTS with COVID-19 group had a higher proportion of males compared to TTS without COVID-19 group (37.8% vs 18.5%). TTS with COVID-19 group had a greater proportion of non-white race. The proportion of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Pacific Islander was higher in the COVID-19 TTS group compared to TTS without COVID-19 group (12.9% vs 8.4%, 20.4% vs 6.5%, 5 vs 2.2%, respectively). TTS in the setting of COVID-19 illness has worse outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, and acute kidney injury. Male sex and non-white race were more likely to be affected by TTS in the setting of COVID-19. The out-of-hospital morbidity and mortality in patients who suffered TTS during COVID-19 illness need further study. Studies are needed to provide mechanistic insights into the interaction between COVID-19 and TTS.

Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome and its prolonged effects: An updated systematic review.

Objective: This systematic review aimed at estimating the prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 symptoms in view of published literature that studied prolonged clinical manifestations after recovery from acute COVID-19 infection. Methods: Relevant databases were searched for extraction of articles. For data synthesis, based on the distribution of quantitative variables, they were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR). Qualitative variables were presented as frequency (n) and percentages (%). Results: Twenty-one articles qualified for the final analysis. The most common persistent clinical manifestations were fatigue (54.11%), dyspnea (24.38%), alopecia (23.21%), hyperhidrosis (23.6%), insomnia (25.98%), anxiety (17.29%), and arthralgia (16.35%). In addition to these symptoms, new-onset hypertension, diabetes, neuropsychiatric disorders, and bladder incontinence were also reported. Conclusion: Clinical features of post-acute COVID-19 infection can manifest even after 60 days of initial infection. Multidisciplinary care along with regular follow-up must be provided to such patients.

Candida glabrata infection of a pancreatic pseudocyst in a COVID-19 patient: A case report and review of the literature

Introduction Pancreatic pseudocysts remain a feared complication of acute or chronic pancreatitis and are often characterized by collections of fluids due to underlying damage to the pancreatic ducts, culminating in a walled-off region bereft of an epithelial layer but surrounded by granulation tissue. While fungal infections of pancreatic pseudocysts are rarely encountered, candida albicans remains the most frequently implicated organism. Case presentation A 55-year-old male presented with pain in the left-hypochondriac region, accompanied by non-bilious emesis and nausea. Interestingly, the patient also tested positive for a COVID-19 infection. Investigative workup divulged enhancing pancreatic walls with a radiologic impression consistent with a pancreatic pseudocyst. An ultrasound-guided external drainage was performed;the drainage was conducted unremarkably, with the resultant fluid collection revealing the presence of Candida Glabrata. The patient was commenced on antifungal therapy and continues to do well to date. Discussion Infectious ailments of pancreatic pseudocysts remain a widely known complication of acute pancreatitis. While it is rare, fungal infection is a crucial consideration for patients with pancreatic pseudocysts, especially in the context of a lack of an adequate response to antibiotics, deterioration, comorbidities, and immunocompromised states. Conclusion Rapid identification of the microbe responsible for pancreatic pseudocyst infection is vital for time-sensitive treatment and a more rapid recovery, curbing associated morbidity and mortality. Highlights • Fungal infections of pancreatic pseudocysts remain a rare but well-characterized complication, culminating in significant morbidity and mortality.• Telltale signs include unresponsiveness to antibiotics and worsening clinical symptoms.• Rapid identification of the responsible microbe is vital for time-sensitive treatment and a more rapid recovery.

Effect of COVID-19 on lipid profile parameters and its correlation with acute phase reactants: A single-center retrospective analysis.

Background and objective: The development and correlation of dyslipidemia is unknown in COVID-19. This investigation was performed to assess the pathological alterations in lipid profile and their association in COVID-19. Methods: This was a retrospective study performed on real-world patients to assess serum levels of LDL-C, HDL, TG, TC on COVID-19 patients (mild: 319; moderate: 391; critical: 357). Age- and gender-matched controls who had their lipid profiles in the same period were included as the control group. Results: LDL-C, HDL, TG, and TC levels were significantly lower in COVID-19 patients when compared with the control group (P < 0.001, 0.047, 0.045, <0.001, respectively). All parameters decreased gradually with COVID-19 disease severity (LDL-C: median (IQR), mild: 98 (91,134); moderate: 97 (81,113); critical: 68 (68,83); HDL: mild: 45 (37,50); moderate: 46 (41,50); critical: 40 (37,46); TG: mild: 186 (150,245); moderate: 156 (109,198); critical: 111 (98,154); TC: mild: 224 (212,238); moderate: 212 (203,213); critical: 154 (125,187)). Logistic regression demonstrated lipid profile as predictor of severity of COVID-19 disease. Conclusion: Hypolipidemia develops in increasing frequency with severe COVID-19 disease. It inversely correlates with levels of acute-phase reactants, indicating SARS-COV-2 as the causative agent for alteration in lipid and thyroid levels.

Epidemiology, clinical ramifications, and cellular pathogenesis of COVID-19 mRNA-vaccination-induced adverse cardiovascular outcomes: A state-of-the-heart review.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has overwhelming healthcare systems globally. To date, a myriad of therapeutic regimens has been employed in an attempt to curb the ramifications of a severe COVID-19 infection. Amidst the ongoing pandemic, the advent and efficacious uptake of COVID-19 vaccination has significantly reduced disease-related hospitalizations and mortality. Nevertheless, many side-effects are being reported after COVID-19 vaccinations and myocarditis is the most commonly reported sequelae post vaccination. Majority of these diseases are associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Various studies have established a temporal relationship between these complications, yet the causality and the underlying pathogenesis remain hypothetical. In this review, we aim to critically appraise the available literature regarding the cardiovascular side effects of the various mRNA vaccines and the associated pathophysiology.

A novel case of lupus nephritis and mixed connective tissue disorder in a COVID-19 patient.

Introduction: Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) is a rare autoimmune condition characterized by Scleroderma, Polymyositis, and Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE). Though a possible relationship between COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases has been recently reported, its pathophysiological mechanism behind flares in Lupus Nephritis (LN), a complication of SLE, remains unknown. Case presentation: A 22-year-old COVID-19 positive female presented with anemia, bilateral pitting edema, periorbital swelling, and posterior cervical lymphadenitis. Further inspection revealed lower abdominal striae, hepatosplenomegaly, and hyperpigmented skin nodules. Complete blood counts showed elevated inflammatory markers and excessively high protein creatinine ratio. Antinuclear antibody titers were elevated (anti-smith and U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein) and Rheumatoid Factor was positive. She was diagnosed with MCTD associated with a flare of LN. To control her lupus flare, a lower dose of steroids was initially administered, in addition to oral hydroxychloroquine and intravenous cyclophosphamide. Her condition steadily improved and was discharged on oral steroid maintenance medication. Discussion: We present a rare phenomenon of newly diagnosed LN, a complication of SLE, with MCTD in a PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patient. The diagnostic conundrum and treatment hurdles should be carefully addressed when patients present with lupus and COVID-19 pneumonia, with further exploration of the immuno-pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection in multi-systemic organ dysfunction in autoimmune disorders. Conclusion: In COVID-19 patients with LN and acute renal injury, it is critical to promptly and cautiously treat symptomatic flares associated with autoimmune disorders such as SLE and MCTD that may have gone unnoticed to prevent morbidity from an additional respiratory infection.

Symptomatology, prognosis and clinical findings of STEMI as a ramification of COVID-19: A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis.

Background: There is an increasing COVID-19 population with concurrent STEMI. SARS-CoV-2 poses a significant risk of hypercoagulable and/or prothrombotic events due to the disturbance in hemostasis by affecting all three components of the Virchow's triad. These abnormalities in hemostasis are an increased risk factor for cardiovascular events, including acute thrombotic occlusion of coronary arteries leading to myocardial infarction. Objective: The objective of this study is to collate the prognosis, symptomatology and clinical findings of COVID-19 adverse events causing STEMI. Methods: Databases were queried with various keyword combinations to find applicable articles. Cardiovascular risk factors, symptomatology, mortality and rates of PCI were analyzed using random-effect model. Results: 15 studies with a total of 379 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age of patients was 62.82 ± 36.01, with a male predominance (72%, n = 274). Hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus were the most common cardiovascular risk factors among these patients, with a pooled proportion of 72%, 59% and 40% respectively. Dyspnea (61%, n = 131) was the most frequent presenting symptom, followed by chest pain (60%, n = 101) and fever (56%, n = 104). 62% of the patients had obstructive CAD during coronary angiography. The primary reperfusion method used in the majority of cases was percutaneous coronary intervention (64%, n = 124). Mortality, which is the primary outcome in our study, was relatively high, with a rate of 34% across studies. Conclusion: Our findings show that most cases have been found in males, while the most common risk factors were Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus. In most COVID-19 cases with ST-segment myocardial infarction, most hospitalized patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention instead of fibrinolysis. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher, making this report significant. As the sample size and reported study are considerably less, it warrants a further large-scale investigation to generalize it.

The Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

COVID-19 has proved to be a serious, and consequential disease that has affected millions of people globally. Previously, the adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been observed with increasing the risk of pneumonia and COVID-19. This meta-analysis aims to address the relationship between the use of PPI and the severity of COVID-19 infection. We conducted a systemic literature search from PUBMED, Science Direct, and Cinahl from December 2019 to January 2022. Published and unpublished randomized control trials and cohort studies were included. Review Manager was used for all statistical analyses. In total, 14 studies were included in this systemic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest include: (1) susceptibility of COVID-19 infection and (2) severity of COVID-19 (defined as the composite of poor outcomes: ICU admission, need for oxygen therapy, need for a ventilator, or death), and (3) mortality due to COVID-19. PPI use was marginally associated with a nominal but statistically significant increase in the risk of COVID-19 infection (OR 1.05 [1.01, 1.09]; I2 97%, p = 0.007). PPI use also increased the risk of the composite poor outcome (OR 1.84 [1.71, 1.99]; I2 98%, p < 0.00001) and mortality (OR 1.12 [1.00, 1.25]; I2 84%, p = 0.05) in patients with COVID-19.

Transformation of acute cholecystitis to acute choledocholithiasis in COVID-19 patient.

The global pandemic of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) or SARS-CoV-2 has numerous manifestations in different organ systems. It is known that SARS-CoV-2 infects the hepatobiliary system leading to presentations such as acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis and hepatitis. Although the exact mechanism of the underlying pathology is unknown, it is likely attributed by the tropism of the virus to the ACE2 receptors in the hepatocytes and bile duct cells resulting in a cytokine storm that precipitates as systemic symptoms from acute COVID-19 infection. In this case report we present a case of a 47-year-old male who presented with signs consistent with acute cholecystitis. It was confirmed on ultrasound and he was incidentally found to be positive for COVID-19 on routine surveillance testing. He was asymptomatic and was being prepped for cholecystectomy, but developed an acute elevation of liver enzymes suggesting choledocholithiasis. After endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and cholecystectomy the patient experienced a rapid normalization of liver enzymes and improvement of his abdominal symptoms.

Chilaiditi syndrome: A structural displacement in a heart failure patient.

BACKGROUND: Chilaiditi's sign is often found incidentally on chest or abdominal radiograph and can be accompanied by clinical symptoms such as abdominal pain, gastrointestinal complications, and less commonly associated with dyspnea. CASE PRESENTATION: In this interesting case, we discover lingering dyspnea in our 79 year old male with a past medical history of asthma and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction admitted for acute heart failure exacerbation with reduced ejection fraction along with a new incidental finding of Chilaiditi's sign on chest radiograph. Patient received optimal diuretics and guideline-directed medical treatment for heart failure exacerbation, but mild dyspnea with pleuritic chest pain persisted. Dyspnea with pleurisy was likely attributed to a structural anatomical defect (Chilaiditi's sign) that can be picked up on imaging. CONCLUSION: Chilaiditi syndrome can be an incidental cause of ongoing persistent dyspnea, and if symptoms are severe, intervention can be warranted for symptomatic resolution. LEARNING OBJECTIVE: Chilaiditi syndrome should be considered as a possible diagnosis among patients with a history of heart failure and incidental Chilaiditi's sign on chest radiographic imaging who suffer from persistent dyspnea and pleurisy despite optimal diuretics and guideline-directed medical treatment.

Complete heart block in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: A case series from a developing country.

Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) has led to a global pandemic and has been the center of attention across the entire medical community. This novel virus was initially thought to affect primarily the respiratory system, but now it is evident that it has a multitude of effects on the human body. Our point of interest is to establish the effect of COVID-19 infection on the conducting system of the heart. We present a case series of four patients who developed complete heart block (CHB) shortly after being infected with COVID-19 without any previous known risk factors of complete heart block. There have only been a few previous case reports on the occurrence of CHB in COVID-19 patients highlighting the importance and the need of our case series to the literature of cardiovascular outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Our case series highlight that COVID-19 can indeed affect the conduction system of the heart and cause CHB in patients who then recovered spontaneously further elucidating the transient nature of cardiovascular effects caused by the novel virus.